<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is this about?</title>
	<link>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/</link>
	<description>Seeking Best Accessibility Practices</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Blog-Fu</title>
		<link>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/#comment-28</link>
		<author>Blog-Fu</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/#comment-28</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Access Matters&lt;/strong&gt;

Bob Easton has a great site called Access Matters. He is searching for accessibility best practices using a quiz format. I really like the idea, and now have the site in the daily check rotation....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Access Matters</strong></p>
<p>Bob Easton has a great site called Access Matters. He is searching for accessibility best practices using a quiz format. I really like the idea, and now have the site in the daily check rotation&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Belov</title>
		<link>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/#comment-404</link>
		<author>Charles Belov</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/#comment-404</guid>
					<description>Here's a topic that could open a can of worms:

The Microsoft Windings font encodes as normal characters. So a telephone symbol becomes a left parenthesis and a check mark symbol becomes an umlatted lower case u when converted to text. Not accessible to anyone using non-IE browsers or non-Microsoft computers.

One possibility for dealing with this is to substitute an equivalent Unicode character. So for the telephone symbol could be substituted with Unicode decimal entity 9742 &#9742; and the check mark symbol could be substituted with Unicode decimal entity 10003 &#10003;. That's assuming there is even an equivalent Unicode symbol.

That substitution would accomodate sighted site visitors in all modern browsers and operating systems. But what about folks who use screen readers? Do screen readers have Unicode symbols built into them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a topic that could open a can of worms:</p>
<p>The Microsoft Windings font encodes as normal characters. So a telephone symbol becomes a left parenthesis and a check mark symbol becomes an umlatted lower case u when converted to text. Not accessible to anyone using non-IE browsers or non-Microsoft computers.</p>
<p>One possibility for dealing with this is to substitute an equivalent Unicode character. So for the telephone symbol could be substituted with Unicode decimal entity 9742 &#9742; and the check mark symbol could be substituted with Unicode decimal entity 10003 &#10003;. That&#8217;s assuming there is even an equivalent Unicode symbol.</p>
<p>That substitution would accomodate sighted site visitors in all modern browsers and operating systems. But what about folks who use screen readers? Do screen readers have Unicode symbols built into them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/#comment-415</link>
		<author>brian</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 02:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/#comment-415</guid>
					<description>This is a great website, if readers have accessibility questions that they would addressed, is there a way to submit quiz questions for review? I have several.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great website, if readers have accessibility questions that they would addressed, is there a way to submit quiz questions for review? I have several.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stenhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/#comment-445</link>
		<author>Mike Stenhouse</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.access-matters.com/2005/03/25/what-is-this-about/#comment-445</guid>
					<description>I'm trying to find the spot to propose a question... Is this it?

I'd really like to know what the browser/screenreader support is for Javascript (see &lt;a href="http://www.boxofchocolates.ca/archives/2005/06/12/javascript-and-accessibility" rel="nofollow"&gt;Derek's Javascript and Accessibility post&lt;/a&gt;). I vaguely remember reading that JAWS had reasonable support for DOM-added nodes and ignored document.write, but I have no idea where. I've not tried it myself yet. Given the recent rise of Javascript in web apps it might be time for a reassessment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to find the spot to propose a question&#8230; Is this it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really like to know what the browser/screenreader support is for Javascript (see <a href="http://www.boxofchocolates.ca/archives/2005/06/12/javascript-and-accessibility" rel="nofollow">Derek&#8217;s Javascript and Accessibility post</a>). I vaguely remember reading that JAWS had reasonable support for DOM-added nodes and ignored document.write, but I have no idea where. I&#8217;ve not tried it myself yet. Given the recent rise of Javascript in web apps it might be time for a reassessment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
